Xalorra | RAG Assistants

Why most RAG fails

Smart chat is cheap.
Grounded assistants are engineered.

Your users don’t need a chatbot. They need answers that can be traced back to your data. That requires scope, artifacts, and contracts—not prompt magic.

The assistant hallucinates

It answers confidently, but it’s not grounded in your dataset scope.

Quality is unmeasurable

No citations. No traces. Nobody can debug why it answered that way.

The stack becomes fragile

RAG flows live in notebooks and ad-hoc scripts that break on real data.

THE APPROACH

A predictable RAG contract, built for production behavior.

Scope the data

Choose namespace/dataset/version. This becomes the contract for grounding.

Index & retrieve

Turn the dataset into retrievable context with embeddings and chunking.

Rerank & cite

Improve relevance and require citations so the model shows its work.

Trace & ship

Traces turn debugging into engineering—then ship behind stable endpoints.

OUTCOME

Assistants that cite sources, produce traces, and behave like production—not like a demo.

Stop shipping “smart chat”.
Ship assistants that can be audited.

Dataset-scoped context to reduce drift.

Citations to build trust and control.

Traces to debug and improve relevance.

A production-first RAG contract

Retrieval, rerank, generation—without chaos.

Xalorra gives your RAG workflow a stable backbone: dataset scope, artifacts, and predictable contracts so the assistant behaves the same in Playground and production.

Grounded by dataset scope

RAG stays tied to namespace/dataset/version—not random prompts and fragile notebooks.

Rerank when it matters

Improve precision when retrieval gets noisy as data grows.

Citations & traces

Make the model show its work and turn debugging into engineering.

Tenant-safe by default

Prevent cross-org leakage by enforcing consistent access patterns.

What you can standardize

Dataset scoping, retrieval config, rerank policy, citation format, and trace metadata—so teams don’t reinvent the same assistant five different ways.

Chunking

Embeddings

Top-k

Rerank

Citations

Traces

Customer Support

Teams that answer with citations

Ground answers on policy + product docs.

Return citations so agents trust outputs.

Trace retrieval to debug failures quickly.

Request a Demo Apply as partner

Support assistant

Cited answers for policy + product docs

QUESTION

Can I get a refund for my subscription?

CITATIONS

policy_refunds.md

relevant: 0.91

billing_faq.md

relevant: 0.83

TRACE

retrieval_time=38ms · rerank=on · tokens=612

Internal Knowledge

Teams that search like a product

Index datasets by namespace and version.

Rerank to keep relevance stable as data grows.

Treat RAG configs as artifacts, not random settings.

Request a Demo Apply as partner

Internal knowledge

Search like a product (scoped + versioned)

INDEX

chunks

124,901

embed_model

text-embed-x

namespace

engineering

version

v12

RESULT

doc

runbooks/oncall.md

doc

architecture/rls.md

Data-to-Text Analytics

Teams that summarize with discipline

Retrieve the right context, not the entire dataset.

Citations show which rows/docs were used.

Ship the workflow behind stable endpoints.

Request a Demo Apply as partner

Data-to-text analytics

Summaries with citations and dataset scope

SCOPE

dataset

transactions

version

SUMMARY

“Revenue rose 12% MoM, driven by SMB renewals…”

cite: rows 1201–1320trace_id: 8c1…2ad

RAG building blocks

Everything you need for grounded assistants.

The building blocks are simple: scope, retrieval, rerank, citations, traces. The win is making them operable as a product.

Index artifact

chunking policy

embedding model

namespace + dataset + version

artifactversionedtenant-safe

Index

Embeddings + chunking

Turn datasets into searchable context. Version it so experiments stay reproducible.

Retrieval contract

top-k + filters

dataset scope enforced

stable shape for citations

artifactversionedtenant-safe

Retrieve

Dataset-scoped retrieval

Retrieve context tied to dataset scope so assistants don’t drift across versions.

Generate

Answers with citations

Make the model show its work. Citations increase trust and reduce hallucinations.

Rerank

Better relevance

Reduce noisy retrieval when the dataset grows. Improve precision before generation.

Trace

Debug like engineering

Traces show retrieved chunks and decisions, so iteration doesn’t become guesswork.

Request a Demo Apply as partner

Deployment

Same behavior in Playground and production.

You test like you ship: dataset scope, versioned artifacts, and predictable HTTP contracts. No “works on my notebook”.

RAG flow

Index → Retrieve → Rerank → Generate (with citations)

SCOPE

namespace

default

dataset

support_docs

version

tenant

RLS enforced

RETRIEVAL

top_k

rerank

enabled

chunks

8 selected

citations

required

ANSWER

“Refunds are available within 14 days for unused subscriptions…”

doc:policy_refunds.mdchunk:12trace_id: 4fd…a91

Serving

Stable endpoints for assistants

Expose RAG behind consistent APIs. Swap models without rewriting workflows.

Quality

Measure grounding

Traces and citations make relevance measurable and iteration fast.

Security

Tenant isolation by default

Prevent cross-org leakage with consistent access patterns and dataset scoping.

LINEAGE

dataset_version

support_docs:v3

index_version

idx:v3.2

rag_config

rag:v1.0

trace_id

9b1…0f2

Repro

Versioned datasets & artifacts

Keep runs explainable with clear lineage. Treat configs as artifacts.

Request a Demo Apply as partner

USE CASE: RAG ASSISTANTS

Build assistants your team can trust.

Grounded answers need scope, citations, and traces. Turn your datasets into a RAG workflow that behaves like production from day one.

Start from a dataset scope

Pick a dataset, index it, retrieve with rerank, then generate with citations. Iterate with traces.

Request a Demo Apply as partner

Prefer docs? Read documentation

Use Case

RAG assistants grounded in your data, not vibes

Why most RAG fails

Smart chat is cheap.
Grounded assistants are engineered.

Stop shipping “smart chat”.
Ship assistants that can be audited.